20180114181843 Taxonomy of Notes
tags: #notetaking
Aims
- To remember (externalize remembering)
- Remember other people’s ideas
- Remember your own ideas
- A mixture of your and others people’s ideas
- Sense-making (make new relationships between ideas in writing)
- To support production of new artifacts (writing)
Types of notes:
- Extracts
- What: Pieces of information from sources, either directly copied or as a paraphrase.
- Usage: For reference when creating new documents or artifacts. Also for long-term retention of useful information.
- Collections and Lists
- References (not in prose) to other things
- Usage:
- Quick reference
- Leads to more detailed information for usage for some specific purpose
- To template some action
- Types of Lists
- Actionable items
- Tasks
- References (in bullet form)
- Records and Logs
- For records
- To derive insight
- Templates
- To provide place holders to execute some tasks or action
- To serve as reminders for gathering new information
- Examlpe: Medical note template
- Summary/Overview
- Higher level documents that bring together lower level (more specific) information. Topical notes that serves to structure and explain discrete information.
- See [[20181007150300]] Structure Notes
- Higher level documents that bring together lower level (more specific) information. Topical notes that serves to structure and explain discrete information.
Not all these go into the ZK. Template and Logs should stay out. Collections and Lists probably also don’t need to be in the ZK, although I don’t see why they couldn’t.
Types of Notes Coming from Reference Sources
General
I want to distinguish notes that are commenting on a source and those that are my original ideas.
For the latter, I have the tag
- #original_thought (my own thoughts that aren’t a response to something)
- #idea (some new idea that emerges from things in the ZK)
- For writing ideas or other things, I keep those in my nvALT. I’m still trying to make the boundary between the ZK and my nvALT
Papers
For individual zettels
- #result
- #background
- #approach
- #analysis
- #fact
- #method
- #argument
- #hypothesis
- #question
- #conclusion
- #critique
- #figure
- #model
- #quote (direct quotes)
- #code (code example)
- #application
- #action_point (especially for how-to and technical books. I want the action points)
For each paper, I want to make one summary note that compiles all the individual zettels from a paper and also let’s me write my thoughts. It would be nice to have a single summary. Also, in this way, I can add tags to the summary that let’s me essentially tag papers without having to tag the original PDF.
How do I identify the source? Well, each note should have a citekey. I think the citekey can be the identifier.
Books
Depending on the type of book, similar types can be used.
- #result
- #fact
- #method
- #argument
- #hypothesis
- #question
- #conclusion
- #critique
- #figure
- #quote (direct quotes)
- #code (code example)
- #application
- #model
- #table
- #action_point (especially for how-to and technical books. I want the action points)
For #overview notes from books, types include:
- #overview
- #action_list
- [[20181029193103]] Making Actionable Notes from Books - Pick The Brain
- #outline (of the book)
Similar to papers, I want one summary note for a book that essentially becomes an outline of the book, but comprised of modular zettels.
For many books, what I really want are the action points. I want actionable knowledge. I care about the source and the evidence, but truly I just want to key points.
Those key points will then go into a checklist-style cheat sheet that I can use to template my own actions.
Thus, when I’m making notes, I don’t need to copy everything verbatim. Perhaps it’s useful to get the original zettels with their quote, but I want my summary. I need breadcrumbs to the details.
For example, if I’m taking code notes, I don’t need to copy all the detail. I really need the entry points back to the detail. The details are all over many resources (PDFs, ebooks, websites,etc.). What I need is a meta-document that tells me where to get the details.
Recent additions (2019)
External information
- Factual information
- Ex. MOA of NSAIDs
- Knowledge from books, video, seminar, etc.
- Principles of Antibiotic Usage
- How to write
For loops
inPython
- Personal info
- Phone numbers
- Addressses
- Passwords
Internally generated
- Idea
- Response to external information
- Comment
- Critique
- Question
- Emotion
- Intention/Plan
- Task/To-do
- Goal
- Plan
- Externalization of thinking
- Listing information
- Relating information (e.g. what I am doing right now. I’m externalizing my thoughts)
- Internal state
- Emotion/Feeling
- Response to stimulus
- Feeling/emotion
- Effect on me
- Observation
- Noting something you see
- Recording/Logging
- Accomplishments
- Tasks completed
- Progress toward goals
- Work performed
- Resources used
- States/status
- Health
- Emotion
- Events
- That something occurred.
- Example: “Went to store.” or “Took a shower”. Also “Priscilla met me at school.”
- What was said or done during the event (e.g. meeting notes)
- Processes/Protocols
- Steps/methods for performing actions (prospective)
- Record of organic processes performed
- Ex. I keep a list of software I installed on the Gereau Lab Ubuntu with notes to how and why I did it. I have this so I can do it again in the future.
- Lab Notebook: Record of what was done and what happened. Documentation.
- Documentation for usage
- For oneself and for others